AI-Human Collaboration and the Future of Work

Caleb Vredevoogd, Ken Arnold

Background

God Made Work Good

“God blessed [the humans] and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground.”” (Genesis 1:28 NIV)

“The Lord God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and take care of it” (Genesis 2:15 NIV)

Additional reading on theology of work:

Brief History of Automation

Since the Industrial Revolution in the 1800s there has been the fear of machines taking over human labor. Admittedly, in the short-term, these fears have been realized. However, in the long-term, automation has evolved fields like manufacture (factories), construction (bulldozers, cranes and excavators) and even research (search engines). Moreover, human roles in these evolved fields have remained, albeit changed and maybe more specialized.

What is AI-Human Collaboration?

AI-Human Collaboration is the idea that this trend can continue with the rise of AI in the workforce. Instead of outright replacement and banishment in a certain field, humans can take on more specialized roles. However, that isn’t to say that there aren’t concerns for both the short and long-term.

Uses

AI and humans taking complementary roles in the workforce. AI/robots carry out the more menial tasks, humans fulfill roles that require them to expect the unexpected.

Proper implementation of AI, like other instances of automation, could see the expansion of human roles.

Ironies of Automation

“We draw on this extensive research alongside recent GenAI user studies to outline four key reasons for productivity loss with GenAI systems: a shift in users’ roles from production to evaluation, unhelpful restructuring of workflows, interruptions, and a tendency for automation to make easy tasks easier and hard tasks harder.”

Ironies of Generative AI: Understanding and mitigating productivity loss in human-AI interactions | Abstract

The irony is not new; see, for example, this 1983 article arguing that automation doesn’t necessarily remove the difficulties in human work.

Who

Potential Concerns

Provocative Questions

Pick one of the following areas to explore in your discussion post. You may address the questions listed here or come up with your own.

Historical

Theological

Social Impact

Dispositions

Further Reading

Acknowledgments

This page was originally written by Calvin CS 344 student Caleb Vredevoogd in Spring 2022. It was revised by Ken Arnold in Spring 2025.

Your Choice of Context/Implications Topic